BJ for Governor  

Home
Issues
Family and Culture
Gender and Politics
Government and Court Reform
Economy
Education
Housing
Other Important Issues
List of All Issues
Slate
Joe Schebel - LtGov
John J. Xenakis - Auditor
Campaign Activities
In The News
Schedule
Barb's Supporters
Events
How To Help
Contribute
Press Information
Barb's Credentials
Campaign Staff
Graphics
Site Map / All Issues

BJ for Governor >> Campaign Activities >> Mark Cimini

Barbara Johnson - Independent Candidate for Governor of Massachusetts

By Mark Cimini

A staunchly independent and pioneering lawyer and political activist, Barbara C. Johnson, announced her candidacy for Governor of Massachusetts. Johnson, an outspoken advocate for court reform -- especially in protecting innocent parents against false accusations of child abuse and domestic violence in divorce actions -- said that these often fraudulent accusations are known as the "nuclear bomb" of the divorce business. Barbara's independent run has been bolstered by a state wide grassroots constituency, many of whom are divorced dads that been directly affected Family Courts.

Barbara Johnson is running on a broad platform including a slate of government reform focusing on individual rights -- the equal rights of fathers in custody and visitation actions, protection of all parents in cases of false accusations of child abuse and domestic violence, problems with adoption and unfair termination of parental rights -- and the ever-present fiscal, social welfare, constitutional, and elder issues facing the state.

Broken Courts

"Reproductive and marital fraud would not be crimes without state legislated and judicial enforced gender biases in the laws.", notes Barbara. "A women getting pregnant should not mean a man has been forced into indentured servitude. Shotgun marriages and forced fatherhood should be things of the past. We must offer men the same reproductive rights women enjoy."

"I want to give rebirth to due process and equal protection by restoring fundamental fairness in the court system," Barbara said. "The current laws relating to domestic violence are of questionable constitutionality because they're the only laws that allow the court to treat someone as a criminal without letting him confront his accuser."

Barbara stressed that the courts allow women to abuse these laws in apparent attempts to gain advantage in divorce proceedings, especially when children are involved. A divorced parents' right to his or her children and the corresponding right of children to both parents are one of the major civil rights issues that Barbara wants to address as Governor.

Barbara notes that "various studies have shown that between seventy to ninety percent of divorces are initiated by women." In business when a contract is broken there is compensation to the injured party. "Contrast this to Family Courts" says Barbara, "where when a marriage contract is broken, one gender is overwhelmingly rewarded for breaking the contract while the other is punished both financially and emotionally."

Barbara asks, "Are we dealing with a 'justice system' or 'legal system'"? "We have to question if justice is in the current system." The failure of the justice system can be seen when:

  • a court-appointed family service officer, guardian ad litem, social worker, psychologist, or judge does not have to be accountable to a mother or a father or a child because they have been given immunity, even though immunity is against our Massachusetts Constitution the discrimination against fathers in the family-law courts, where a War of the Roses takes place on a daily basis across the Commonwealth
  • the constitutionally protected right to a jury trial is denied and replaced with biased decisions from judges
  • the discrimination against children in the family-law courts, where hundreds of times a day children lose at least one of their parents in divorce proceedings across the Commonwealth
  • the termination of parental rights cases, in which both mothers as well as fathers lose their children to the government or to foster care or to adoptee parents
  • every few minutes a man -- again over 95 percent of the time -- is arrested, handcuffed, and locked up because he is presumed to be guilty of a bogus charge of a violation of a restraining order -- even when there was no violence. Arresting nine angels in order to get the one devil who is not going to be stopped by a piece of paper is not the way to protect women or children or even the man who is battered by his wife or girl friend
  • every few minutes when the police fail to charge the person who makes the bogus report to the police with breaking the existing law against such false reporting
  • a child is abused in foster care and DSS, supposedly the child-protection agency, does nothing about it, and the courts play along and rubber-stamp whatever DSS's conclusion is
  • the courts delegate decisions about a family's life to untrained or improperly trained folks as guardians ad litem or as parenting coordinators and then mindlessly rubber-stamp whatever that person says
  • family-law does not allow a person -- man or woman -- accused of wrongdoing to cross-examine the accuser
  • a noncustodial spouse -- usually a man -- is left with insufficient money to support himself after the family break-up
  • income for a noncustodial spouse -- usually a man -- does not have the means attributed to him is threatened with debtors prison or self imposed financial ruin. It does not matter, Johnny, whether you cannot find a job like the good-paying one you once had. It does not matter that you might have become disabled . . . or that there is a recession . . . or that you have started a new family . . . or that you do not have visitation with your child(ren) . . . or that you share custody with the mother of the child but she is not ordered to contribute to the financial obligations. The courts simply do not care that he is left with insufficient money to support himself after the family break-up
  • a woman is given the assistance of a victim witness advocate, but the man is not
  • a woman who has a male child is turned away from a battered woman's shelter because of the child's gender
  • a man does not have a battered man's shelter to go to
  • a woman is provided an appointed lawyer from a group receiving grants -- distributed by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts -- for attorneys who represent the mothers but not fathers.

A basic precept Barbara wishes to reestablish is that people should not have to purchase justice. "A simplified legal processes, on-line forms, night and weekend court hours would all be a step in the right direction." The judicial branch provides a necessary function in society and needs to be more accessible and less costly to fulfill it's role. For example, hundreds of laws, both state and federal, impose government opinion on marriage and divorce. Far too many.

"If a man can't see his children" she said, "he shouldn't have to pay child support. If a woman didn't get her child support, you'd see how fast the kids would see their dad." "Shared parenting is realchild support," says Barbara. "Sharing actual expenses - clothes and activity costs - should be all that the State requires. Following a divorce, parents need to establish separate, independent existence." Parents continue to be parents and need to provide both time and financial support to the children, but should not need to subsidize the other parents existence.

Economy

Massachusetts has long been a leader in providing social services. "What we need to do", says Barbara, "is continue that tradition while lessening government waste. Consumer also need protection from predatory business practices."

"Tenants should be given ownership of abandoned housing." Barbara points out, "There is pride in ownership. Give a family a house or an apartment to call 'theirs,' a can of paint will quickly replace the 6-pack at the end of the day."

Barbara wants to lower interest rates on credit cards. "There is no reason that the banks are charging such high rates of interest when the real interest rates are so low."

Barbara wants line-item vetos in order to lower taxes. "Additional property tax is not the way to go. . . . Capping the property tax of low- and middle-income people is something I'd like to see."

Education

High on Barbara's list is the improvement of the quality of education. Vouchers would be the test of supply and demand in the education arena. Home-schooling is also an option she is considering very, very strongly. She wants to see that certain standards are in place.

MCAS is another area that has caught her attention. Reports are that in top school systems with top students, MCAS is too restrictive and cuts the time available for interesting studies. In the lower-performing systems, MCAS not only helps measure the progress of low-performing students but it ALSO calls attention to the problem presented by low-performing teachers or a municipality's low-quality educational plan.

Bottom line

"The list is longer than a 25-second sound bite, so these cases do not make the 11 o'clock news on your favorite television station or the front page of your favorite newspaper." she says, "The facts are too many. The legal issues are too complex. So the public is not aware of the failing legal system until they are bit on their own bottom."

Ask Barbara why she is running for Governor, "Only someone who understands the disease which is gnawing away at our people, at our families, at the legal system itself, should sit in that chair to make rapid change possible and educate the people of Massachusetts to the erosion of due process and equal protection of all our laws."

"The financial rewards of many, many millions of dollars from the Federal government to the State and its many institutions are destroying families at an enormous rate." Barbara has made a family's right to stay together or to be reunified one of the major civil rights' issues in her campaign for Governor. Government's encroachment on it's citizens constitutional rights has affected too many American's right of self determination and free will.

Simplified laws, a reformed judicial system, and restoration of constitutional rights will provide for a leaner government, lower taxes, and personal freedom as promised by the Constitution. A return of control of our government to the people.

People need to be reawakened to the voting process. Voters and nonvoters both need to know that their votes can count. Major offices are usually won with less than one-third of the eligible voters casting ballots. Far too many people have become complacent and fail to vote. Those who do not vote out number those who do. Time to change things. People need to vote.

For those who do not vote, get out and vote for a change. For those who vote but don't like the choices of the past, vote for a change. For those who vote for the parties that have brought us to our current state, vote for a change. Vote Barbara, vote for a change.

For more information on Barbara's run, please visit her web site at http://www.barbforgovernor.com/


Copyright © 2002 by Barbara C. Johnson.
Web Site Software developed by John J. Xenakis, Xenakis Consulting Services, Inc.